| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Rosalinda Losada
|
Co defendants |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1974-01-01 | N/A | Conspiracy to distribute cocaine mentioned in the cited case United States v. Cambindo Valencia. | Unknown (Case History) | View |
This document is page 14 of a legal filing from May 25, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It argues that Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with the USAO-SDFL does not protect the current defendant under the Double Jeopardy Clause because the NPA was merely an agreement between parties, not a judicial adjudication of facts. The text cites *United States v. Cambindo Valencia* to distinguish how plea agreements affecting third parties (like Jesus and Rosalinda Losada) operate legally.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity