Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Mr. Epstein's counsel

Person
Mentions
4
Relationships
4
Events
4
Documents
2
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
4 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Government (USAO)
Adversarial professional
6
1
View
person Prosecutors (Villafaña, Sloman, Menchel, Lourie, Acosta)
Adversarial professional
5
1
View
person attorney representative for these persons [victims]
Professional
5
1
View
person Mr. Epstein
Professional
5
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A Legal agreement The creation and handling of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Epstein's counsel, which was ... N/A View
N/A Legal agreement Execution of an agreement between The United States and Epstein regarding civil claims from victims. N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding A legal dispute occurred regarding Mr. Epstein's classification in New York, where his counsel ar... New York View
2019-07-15 Legal proceeding A court argument took place where counsel for Epstein made statements. Court View

EFTA00027666.pdf

This document is an Opinion and Order from a U.S. District Court case related to Jeffrey Epstein. It details the history of Epstein's sexual abuse of minor girls, including Petitioners Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2, from 1999 to 2007 in Palm Beach, Florida, and internationally. The document outlines the investigation by the PBPD and FBI, and the subsequent discussions and negotiations between the U.S. Attorney's Office and Epstein's legal team from 2006 to 2007, including efforts to secure a plea agreement and manage press coverage.

Court document (opinion and order)
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00000547.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript where an attorney argues that their client, Mr. Epstein, is not a flight risk. The attorney cites past actions as evidence, including not fleeing before his Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), hiring lawyers, and serving time in county jail, from which he was released in 2010. The document also mentions a past legal dispute in New York regarding Mr. Epstein's classification.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
2
Total
2

Factual proffer discussion

From: federal prosecutor
To: Mr. Epstein's counsel

Stated that if Epstein pled guilty to obstruction, the factual proffer could rely on the incident where investigators forced a victim's father off the road.

Communication
2007-09-18
Communication Source

Plea discussions

From: Florida federal prosec...
To: Mr. Epstein's counsel

Prosecutors looking for misdemeanors Epstein could plead guilty to, including 18 U.S.C. § 1512(d) and 18 U.S.C. § 403.

Email/letter
2007-09-13
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search