| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Redacted Recipient (Email 1)
|
Professional collaborative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Sender (Email 2 / USMS)
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Recipient (Email 1)
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 |
This document is an email chain from October 2019 between a trial attorney from Edwards Pottinger LLC and likely federal investigators. The attorney informs the recipient that they represent four additional victims ready to speak about their experiences with Jeffrey Epstein and requests to schedule meetings during a victim briefing in New York on October 23 or 24. The recipient agrees to the meetings and suggests a preliminary discussion regarding the victims' backgrounds.
This document is an email chain dated July 25, 2019, between government officials (one associated with the US Marshals Service). The discussion concerns an 'Epstein incident,' likely referring to the July 23, 2019 event where Epstein was found injured in his cell. One official is requesting copies of any reports prepared in relation to Epstein, and the respondent agrees to send them upon arriving at their location.
This document is a forwarded email chain dated August 14, 2019, containing an original message from August 10, 2019 (the day of Jeffrey Epstein's death). The subject line 'Count Slips' refers to inmate headcount records from the correctional facility. The email appears to be part of the internal communication or investigation gathering evidence regarding the monitoring of Epstein at the MCC New York.
This document is an email thread from April 2021 regarding the scheduling of a 'follow-up interview by video' for an unnamed individual. The correspondence involves the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The emails discuss specific dates in May 2021 for this interview.
This document is an email thread from late August 2019 regarding the case United States v. Epstein. One party asks if a transcript for that week's hearing was ordered, and the respondent confirms they did order it and attaches the file (J8RpEPSf.pdf). The identities of the correspondents are redacted.
This document is an email chain between employees of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY Public Affairs). Discussions center around a news article from the NY Post reporting that Ghislaine Maxwell was spotted at an In-N-Out Burger shortly after Jeffrey Epstein's death. The tone is casual, with one participant commenting, 'I mean . . . it's a good burger!'
An email exchange from March 2011 where one individual thanks another for returning photos via FedEx. The correspondence references 'progress on the case', suggesting a legal investigation context, and notes the photos were sent from Florida.
This document is an email thread from October 2020 between redacted individuals discussing search terms to be applied to Epstein's electronic devices using Relativity software. The conversation involves refining the keyword list, with specific suggestions to add 'massage', 'masseuse', and 'passenger'. The thread references an attached search warrant (20 mag 6719) dated June 26, 2020.
This document is an internal email chain within the Southern District of New York (SDNY) dated December 19, 2019. An Assistant U.S. Attorney reports on a call with counsel for the Trustees of the Epstein estate, who requested a meeting with a senior SDNY official (name redacted) to negotiate the resolution of the government's civil forfeiture claims and discuss a proposed victim compensation fund. The email highlights that the line assistants lack the authority to negotiate these terms.
This document is an email chain from November 2020 discussing 'Epstein victim requests'. The correspondents discuss how to respond to these requests and reference cross-checking names against a 'Masseuse list document'. One email notes that names from a request were not found on the masseuse list, with one partial exception. The identities of the senders and recipients are redacted.
This document is an email chain from June 2, 2021, between an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) and opposing counsel regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The correspondence discusses scheduling an 'order of proof meeting' for mid-June and mentions upcoming work on legal filings including a Daubert motion and a 404(b) motion. The top email includes an attachment for the trial schedule order.
An email chain from February 2021 between members of the Southern District of New York (SDNY) prosecution team. An Assistant United States Attorney circulates a draft document titled 'GM_Government_Opposition' (likely relating to Ghislaine Maxwell) for team review before sending it to their supervisors ('the chiefs'). A colleague replies with praise ('really persuasive') and attached edits.
This document is a chain of three emails from May 2020 between redacted government officials (likely involving the DOJ and OIG). The correspondence concerns coordination regarding an Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) in the Civil Division who is handling a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request related to Jeffrey Epstein. The officials agree to share contact information to facilitate communication between the Civil Division and the Office of Inspector General (OIG) or General Counsel's Office.
This document is an email chain from November 2021 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY), the FBI, and the NYPD regarding the processing of evidence in the Epstein case. An analyst reports on querying specific phone numbers within the 'Relativity' database, noting 'hits' and 'exact matches,' and organizing the results under 'US vs Epstein' (JE) and search warrants (JE SW). The correspondence indicates ongoing forensic analysis of phone data well after Epstein's death, likely in preparation for the Ghislaine Maxwell trial.
This document is an email chain dated November 3, 2020, with the subject 'Epstein victim requests'. The correspondence discusses attached documents, specifically referencing a 'Masseuse list document' and names contained in footnotes. The sender notes a discrepancy where names on the list do not match the requester's name, with one exception.
This document is an email chain between US Attorneys in the Southern District of New York dated August 14, 2019 (shortly after Epstein's death). An Assistant United States Attorney requests the 'Epstein Pros Memo' (Prosecution Memo). A colleague replies attaching three documents: a Prosecution Memo dated June 17, 2019, a Status Memo for the ODAG (Office of the Deputy Attorney General) dated June 19, 2019, and an Urgent Matter Report dated June 24, 2019. The sender notes these documents are from 'when we were charging'.
An email chain from July 22, 2020, discussing the sudden release of digital evidence ('extractions') by the FBI regarding the Epstein case. The correspondents express frustration that after 'ten months of nothing,' the FBI provided nearly all data in a single week. The emails coordinate the transfer of a hard drive containing these items to 'Southern' (likely SDNY), noting that two servers still require hardware data recovery.
An email chain from February 2021 between the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and another office (likely Southern District of Florida). SDNY requests a specific document ('Box #1 P-003679 Thru P-003680') from the 'SDFL Epstein file' referenced in a privilege log connected to the CVRA lawsuit. The responding office cites technical issues with vendor scans and a reduced 25% in-office work schedule, necessitating a staff member to drive in specifically to locate the physical document.
This document is an internal email chain from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated August 6-7, 2019. The correspondence concerns drafting a response to 'Epstein defense preservation requests' and references an '8/1 supplemental request' and a 'discovery motion schedule.' The emails involve an Assistant U.S. Attorney and other staff coordinating edits and discussions regarding legal responses to the Epstein defense team shortly before Epstein's death.
This document is an email chain from October 2020 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and the FBI regarding the forensic review of image and video files from Jeffrey Epstein's electronic devices. The email outlines a specific list of ten device IDs (e.g., NYC024363) assigned to the FBI for initial review and attaches legal protocols, search warrants, and the Maxwell indictment.
An email chain between Assistant United States Attorneys (SDNY) regarding a 'protective order for discovery' dated July 24, 2019. The attachment filename includes the initials 'JE', indicating the document relates to the Jeffrey Epstein case shortly after his arrest.
An email thread from February 2021 (post-dating Epstein's death, likely related to litigation/discovery) discussing edits to a document labeled 'sections V and VI'. The correspondence involves the exchange of a specific paragraph and an attachment named 'Section_V,_A_(P117).docx'. All participant identities are redacted.
An email thread from October 15, 2019, between two redacted individuals discussing technical assistance. One individual asks for help loading a 'subpoena return for the Epstein case' onto a shared drive because they cannot open the disc, suggesting it might require IT help. The respondent agrees to come by and collect the disc.
This document is an email chain between Assistant United States Attorneys (SDNY) dated October 12-13, 2021. The correspondence concerns legal preparations, specifically drafting Motions in Limine (MIL) regarding 'pseudonyms' (likely for victim anonymity) and 'sympathy'. The emails mention attachments including 'Anonymity_v.1' and a 2019 Govt MIL document. One participant is noted to be traveling to California.
This document is an email chain from August 2019, shortly after Jeffrey Epstein's death, with the subject 'US v. Epstein'. The correspondence discusses the administrative processing of documents received from the FOIA office, noting that they have been uploaded to the 'Relativity' e-discovery platform and are likely duplicative of Florida case files already being processed. The names of the individuals communicating are redacted.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity