| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Brad
|
Professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
narrator
|
Business associate |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Marc S. Nurik
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Bradley Edwards
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Marc Nurik
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Employee |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Adversarial |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Edwards
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Charlie Crist
|
Friend |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Arnold Schwarzenegger
|
Political donor |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Co defendants alleged co conspirators |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the author
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Edwards
|
Former professional connection |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Russell Adler
|
Co conspirators |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Edwards
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Exploitative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
BRAD EDWARDS
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Haddad
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Exploitative indirect |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bradley Edwards
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bradley Edwards
|
Alleged conspirator denied |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jonee' Edwards
|
Alleged co conspirators denied |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jonee' Edwards
|
Alleged association denied |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Sexual assault cases against Epstein | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alleged fraudulent presentations by Scott Rothstein to investors about lawsuits against Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Bradley Edwards joining Scott Rothstein's firm. | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Scott Rothstein's Ponzi Scheme | Florida (implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Rothstein Ponzi Scheme | Florida (implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein filed a lawsuit against the affiant, Brad Edwards, and Scott Rothstein alleging conspirac... | Court (implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Receptions for prominent politicians hosted by Scott Rothstein | Unspecified (likely Fort La... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of Scott Rothstein regarding the Ponzi scheme and Epstein cases. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Rothstein researches Epstein on the internet to confirm he is a billionaire. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Rothstein decides to use the Epstein case to further his Ponzi scheme due to a need for an influx... | Unknown | View |
| 2025-04-01 | N/A | Author joined the law firm Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler (RRA). | RRA Offices | View |
| 2013-10-01 | N/A | Epstein sued Bradley Edwards alleging fraud and conspiracy with Scott Rothstein. | Unknown (likely Florida) | View |
| 2012-06-21 | N/A | Letter sent regarding transcript review | Miami, FL | View |
| 2012-06-14 | N/A | Deposition of Scott Rothstein | Ft. Lauderdale, Florida (Vi... | View |
| 2010-06-09 | N/A | Sentencing hearing for Scott Rothstein where he received 50 years. | U.S. District Court, Southe... | View |
| 2010-01-27 | N/A | Plea Agreement in United States v. Scott W. Rothstein. | S.D. Fla. | View |
| 2009-12-07 | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein filed a state civil RICO lawsuit charging Rothstein and Brad Edwards with abuses ... | State Court (Florida) | View |
| 2009-12-01 | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein filed a RICO lawsuit against Scott Rothstein, Bradley Edwards, and victim 'L.M.' | Florida | View |
| 2009-11-01 | N/A | RRA's $1.2 billion Ponzi scheme was exposed and the firm imploded. | Florida | View |
| 2009-11-01 | N/A | Scott Rothstein’s Ponzi scheme became public knowledge; Narrator left RRA. | Florida (Implied) | View |
| 2009-10-27 | N/A | Scott Rothstein takes chartered jet to Casablanca. | Casablanca, Morocco | View |
| 2009-10-27 | N/A | Charlie Crist leaves voicemail for Scott Rothstein. | Florida (implied) | View |
| 2009-04-01 | N/A | Bradley Edwards joins Rothstein's firm. | Rothstein's firm | View |
| 2009-01-01 | N/A | Scott Rothstein's Ponzi scheme details widely publicized; Edwards severed connections with Rothst... | N/A | View |
| 2009-01-01 | N/A | Scott Rothstein's Ponzi scheme became public knowledge. 'I' and other RRA attorneys became aware ... | N/A | View |
This document is a 'Counsel List' page from a legal filing in the case of Edwards adv. Epstein (Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG), likely from 2009 based on the case number. It lists contact information for attorneys representing Jeffrey Epstein (Jack Goldberger, Martin Weinberg, Joseph Ackerman, and the firm Farmer, Jaffe, et al.) and an attorney representing Scott Rothstein (Marc S. Nurik). The document includes email addresses, physical addresses in Florida and Massachusetts, and phone/fax numbers.
This is a 'Notice of Filing' from May 17, 2011, in a civil case where Jeffrey Epstein is suing Scott Rothstein, Bradley Edwards, and L.M. Attorney Jack Scarola, representing Bradley Edwards, is filing a transcript of a telephone interview with Virginia Roberts. This evidence is intended to support a motion to amend the counter-claim to assert punitive damages.
This document is a condensed transcript (Pages 1-4) of a videotaped deposition of Bradley J. Edwards, taken on March 23, 2010, in West Palm Beach, Florida. The case involves Jeffrey Epstein as the plaintiff against Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and L.M. Notable attendees included Jeffrey Epstein himself and his legal team, including Alan Dershowitz.
This document is the cover page for the deposition of Scott Rothstein, taken on June 14, 2012, in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. The deposition is part of a civil lawsuit (Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG) filed by Jeffrey Epstein against Scott Rothstein and Bradley J. Edwards in the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County. The document includes a Bates stamp indicating it is part of a House Oversight Committee production.
This document is a legal declaration by an attorney representing victims of Jeffrey Epstein. It details the legal strategy regarding RICO and federal claims, specifically the importance of flight logs in establishing a federal nexus via interstate commerce for sexual abuse cases. It also mentions the attorney's departure from the RRA law firm following the exposure of Scott Rothstein's Ponzi scheme and the subsequent settlement of Epstein cases in July 2010.
This document is an affidavit from an attorney who joined Scott Rothstein's law firm (RRA) in 2009 while representing victims of Jeffrey Epstein. The author denies involvement in Rothstein's Ponzi scheme and refutes Epstein's allegations that the lawsuits were used for fraud or that depositions of 'high profile friends' were improper. The text asserts that Epstein paid for the legal representation of his employees and associates (including Ghislaine Maxwell and pilots) to ensure they refused to testify.
This document is a page from a legal affidavit, likely by an attorney representing Epstein's victims. It details a taped conversation between Jeffrey Epstein and journalist George Rush, in which Epstein reportedly admitted to crossing the line but claimed his actions warranted only a '$100 fine' and showed no remorse. The document also discusses a retaliatory lawsuit filed by Epstein against attorneys Brad Edwards and Scott Rothstein, and mentions specific allegations regarding a 15-year-old victim (Jane Doe 102) trafficked on Epstein's private plane.
This document is a 2011 article from the Palm Beach Daily News reporting that Circuit Judge David Crow dismissed a lawsuit filed by Jeffrey Epstein against attorney Brad Edwards and denied Epstein's request for a gag order. Epstein had accused Edwards, who represented victims, of 'abuse of process' for threatening to depose powerful figures like Donald Trump and Bill Clinton. The article notes the legal arguments between Epstein's lawyer Joseph Ackerman and Edwards' lawyer Jack Scarola regarding media statements and the validity of the complaint.
This 2011 article from PalmBeachDailyNews.com details the release of Jeffrey Epstein's 'little black book' (address book) during civil litigation against attorney Brad Edwards. The document lists numerous high-profile contacts including Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, Donald Trump, and various celebrities and Palm Beach socialites. It also mentions allegations by Virginia Roberts (Jane Doe 102) regarding her time with Epstein and Prince Andrew, as well as a financial transaction involving Sarah Ferguson.
This document is page 9 of a legal motion in the case 'Edwards adv. Epstein' (Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG). It argues that Jeffrey Epstein's claims linking Edwards to Scott Rothstein's Ponzi scheme were completely baseless, noting that Epstein voluntarily dismissed the claims right before a summary judgment hearing. The text asserts Edwards had no involvement in the scheme and characterizes Epstein's allegations as lacking substance.
This document is page 5 of a legal motion in the case Edwards adv. Epstein. It details Epstein's allegations that attorney Brad Edwards conspired with Ponzi schemer Scott Rothstein to 'pump' the value of sexual assault cases against Epstein for investors. The text highlights the irony that while Epstein claimed these cases had 'minimal value' and sued Edwards for aggressive litigation tactics, Epstein asserted his Fifth Amendment privilege regarding the abuse and ultimately settled the three cases for a confidential amount.
This page from a legal filing argues against Jeffrey Epstein's claims that attorney Edwards was involved in a Ponzi scheme or 'pumped' cases to investors. The text defends Edwards' actions as ethical legal advocacy, notes that the lawsuits were filed in 2008 before Edwards knew Scott Rothstein, and highlights that Epstein paid significant settlements in these cases. A footnote mentions that Epstein filed a retaliatory bar complaint against Edwards which was dismissed.
This page is from a legal filing arguing for summary judgment in favor of a defendant named Edwards against allegations made by Epstein. The text argues that Epstein's claim of negligence—specifically that Edwards 'should have known' about a Ponzi scheme run by his law partner Scott Rothstein—is legally deficient and lacks necessary elements like duty and causation. The document cites Florida case law to support the argument that Edwards cannot be held liable for failing to anticipate Rothstein's criminal deception.
This document is page 6 of a legal motion for summary judgment filed by a defendant named Edwards against claims made by Epstein. The text argues that Epstein's allegations linking Edwards to a Ponzi scheme run by Scott Rothstein are baseless and unsupported by evidence. It mentions that Edwards has provided sworn testimony and a deposition denying any knowledge of the fraud, and a footnote notes that Epstein has already dismissed claims against another defendant identified as L.M.
This document is a page from a legal filing defending attorney Edwards against a lawsuit brought by Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein's complaint alleged that Edwards conspired with Scott Rothstein (of the RRA law firm) to use sexual assault lawsuits against Epstein to 'pump' a Ponzi scheme by preventing settlements. The document refutes these claims as false, noting that Edwards was simply providing competent representation to victims (L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe) whom Epstein had sexually abused.
This document is the first page of a Renewed Motion for Final Summary Judgment filed by Bradley J. Edwards in a civil lawsuit brought by Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach County, Florida (Case No. 50 2009CA 040800...). Edwards argues that there is no evidence he participated in fraud against Epstein and asserts that his actions were legitimate legal representation of three clients (L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe) whom Epstein sexually abused. The document is marked as Exhibit B and bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
This page of a legal affidavit, likely by attorney Brad Edwards, addresses allegations that his lawsuits against Epstein were used to fuel Scott Rothstein's Ponzi scheme. The author denies knowledge of the scheme and defends the strategy of deposing Epstein's high-profile friends. The document asserts that Epstein paid the legal fees for key associates including Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, and pilots like Larry Visoski to ensure they refused to testify (pleading the Fifth) regarding daily sexual abuse of minors.
This legal document outlines legal conflicts between Jeffrey Epstein and attorney Bradley Edwards in 2010. It confirms that Edwards was officially designated a victim of the Scott Rothstein Ponzi scheme by the U.S. Attorney's Office, and that a Florida Bar complaint filed by Epstein against Edwards regarding Rothstein was dismissed. The document also details Epstein's March 17, 2010 deposition where he repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment when asked about his specific allegations against Edwards and about individuals in California Edwards sought to depose.
This document outlines facts regarding Scott Rothstein's Ponzi scheme at the law firm RRA. It specifically addresses allegations that Rothstein used cases against Jeffrey Epstein—handled by attorney Bradley J. Edwards—to lure investors. The text defends Edwards, stating he worked at RRA for less than a year, had no knowledge of the fraud, and never substantively discussed the Epstein cases with Rothstein.
This legal document page argues that Edwards reasonably expected Epstein to be liable for substantial punitive damages due to his history of molesting children and billionaire status. It notes that on July 6, 2010, Epstein settled civil suits with victims L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe to avoid trial, and discusses Epstein's attempt to link Edwards to a Ponzi scheme (involving Scott Rothstein) as an excuse for failing to settle cases for 'minimal value.'
This document is a 'Statement of Undisputed Facts' filed by defendant Bradley J. Edwards in a civil case brought by Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach County, Florida (Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG). The filing asserts as Fact #1 that Epstein has a 'sexual preference for young children,' citing a deposition from March 17, 2010. A footnote details that during this deposition, Epstein invoked his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent regarding this subject, which Edwards argues allows for an adverse inference against Epstein.
This document is page 4 of Brad Edwards' opposition to Jeffrey Epstein's motion for summary judgment in a civil case (Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG). Edwards argues that Epstein's claims of wrongdoing against him are unsubstantiated and that Edwards had no involvement in the Scott Rothstein fraud. The text explicitly states Epstein is a 'serial molester of minors' (citing Virginia Roberts' statement) and references Epstein's guilty plea and agreement with the US Attorney's Office regarding payments to approximately 34 victims.
This document is page 2 of Bradley Edwards' opposition to Jeffrey Epstein's motion for summary judgment in a civil case. It argues that Epstein's lawsuit against Edwards was a bad-faith intimidation tactic designed to drain resources and deter legitimate claims, asserting that Epstein knew he had actually molested Edwards' clients and had no intention of waiving his Fifth Amendment rights to allow for proper discovery. The footnotes list various evidentiary exhibits, including depositions of Epstein (2012), Edwards (2010), and Scott Rothstein (2012), as well as a transcript of a telephone interview with Virginia Roberts.
This is a legal filing from the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County in a case where Jeffrey Epstein is suing Bradley J. Edwards and Scott Rothstein. Edwards is responding to Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment, arguing that Epstein's claims of malicious prosecution and abuse of process are meritless. The text details Epstein's allegation that Edwards and Rothstein used sexual assault lawsuits against Epstein to 'pump' cases for Rothstein's Ponzi scheme investors, an allegation Edwards vehemently denies.
This document details legal proceedings and events related to Jeffrey Epstein and Scott Rothstein. It describes Jane Doe's RICO and federal claims against Epstein, emphasizing the role of flight logs as evidence of interstate commerce to establish a 'federal nexus' for sexual assaults. It also mentions the affiant's involvement in the Rothstein Ponzi scheme as a victim and their role in reaching settlements in Epstein-related lawsuits.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | local and regiona... | SCOTT ROTHSTEIN | $1,000,000,000.00 | Value of Rothstein's Ponzi scheme/con. | View |
| N/A | Received | local and regiona... | SCOTT ROTHSTEIN | $0.00 | Rothstein allegedly bilked investors of 'millio... | View |
| N/A | Received | local and regiona... | SCOTT ROTHSTEIN | $0.00 | Ponzi scheme to sell Jeffrey Epstein cases that... | View |
| N/A | Paid | SCOTT ROTHSTEIN | local and regiona... | $0.00 | Alleged Ponzi scheme fraud using Epstein case f... | View |
| N/A | Received | local and regiona... | SCOTT ROTHSTEIN | $1,200,000,000.00 | Ponzi scheme run by Rothstein. | View |
| 2009-01-01 | Paid | SCOTT ROTHSTEIN | Political campaigns | $0.00 | Campaign contributions handed out at receptions. | View |
| 2009-01-01 | Paid | SCOTT ROTHSTEIN | Charitable instit... | $0.00 | Charitable donations. | View |
| 2009-01-01 | Paid | SCOTT ROTHSTEIN | Politicians | $0.00 | Hundreds of thousands in contributions. | View |
| 2009-01-01 | Paid | SCOTT ROTHSTEIN | Joe DiMaggio Chil... | $0.00 | Gave millions. | View |
Told investors that victims were paid up-front money to prevent settlement.
Russ Adler told Rothstein that Jeffrey Epstein was a billionaire.
Told investors minor girls were paid up-front money to prevent settling.
Adler told Rothstein that some plaintiffs/clients had traveled on Epstein's airplane.
Pitching fake settlements to investors using Epstein case files as props.
Scott - You're amazing! Charlie Crist
Check-in, mentioning 'working Versace', enjoying seeing Scott and Kimmie, watching football.
Check-in, mentioning 'working Versace', enjoying seeing Scott and Kimmie, watching football.
Falsely informing investors that settlement agreements were available for purchase.
Falsely informing investors that settlement agreements were available for purchase.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity