DOJ-OGR-00019824.jpg
680 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
4
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court notice (notice of defective filing)
File Size:
680 KB
Summary
This document is a 'Notice of Defective Filing' from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated April 1, 2021, regarding the case United States of America v. Maxwell (Docket 21-58). The court clerk notified the appellant that a 'Notice of Appearance as Additional Counsel' submitted on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell was rejected because the PDF file was not text-searchable, violating Local Rules 25.1 and 25.2. The document lists Judge Nathan as the District Court judge and references the underlying SDNY docket number 1:20-cr-330-1.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Appellant/Defendant |
Subject of the legal case; her counsel submitted the defective document.
|
| Debra Ann Livingston | Chief Judge |
Listed as Chief Judge of the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
|
| Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe | Clerk of Court |
Listed as Clerk of Court for the Second Circuit.
|
| Nathan | DC Judge |
Listed as the District Court Judge (likely Alison Nathan, though only surname is listed).
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit |
Issuing court
|
|
| United States of America |
Plaintiff/Appellee in the case
|
|
| SDNY |
Southern District of New York (District Court)
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (implied by footer DOJ-OGR)
|
Timeline (2 events)
2021-04-01
Submission of Notice of Appearance as Additional Counsel on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell.
US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Ghislaine Maxwell's Counsel
2021-04-01
Issuance of Notice of Defective Filing regarding the previous submission.
US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Clerk of Court
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of SDNY court
|
Relationships (2)
Case title: United States of America v. Maxwell
Listed as DC Judge for Maxwell's case
Key Quotes (3)
"On April 01, 2021 the Notice of Appearance as Additional Counsel, on behalf of the Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell was submitted in the above referenced case."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019824.jpg
Quote #1
"The document does not comply with the FRAP or the Court's Local Rules for the following reason:"Source
DOJ-OGR-00019824.jpg
Quote #2
"Not Text-Searchable (Local Rule 25.1, Local Rules 25.2)"Source
DOJ-OGR-00019824.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,000 characters)
Case 21-58, Document 32, 04/01/2021, 3068158, Page1 of 2
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10007
Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10007
DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON
CHIEF JUDGE
CHIEF JUDGE
CATHERINE O'HAGAN WOLFE
CLERK OF COURT
CLERK OF COURT
Date: April 01, 2021
Docket #: 21-58
Short Title: United States of America v. Maxwell
Docket #: 21-58
Short Title: United States of America v. Maxwell
DC Docket #: 1:20-cr-330-1
DC Court: SDNY (NEW YORK CITY)DC Docket #: 1:20-cr-330-1
DC Court: SDNY (NEW YORK CITY)
DC Judge: Nathan
DC Court: SDNY (NEW YORK CITY)DC Docket #: 1:20-cr-330-1
DC Court: SDNY (NEW YORK CITY)
DC Judge: Nathan
NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE FILING
On April 01, 2021 the Notice of Appearance as Additional Counsel, on behalf of the Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell was submitted in the above referenced case. The document does not comply with the FRAP or the Court's Local Rules for the following reason:
______ Failure to submit acknowledgment and notice of appearance (Local Rule 12.3)
______ Failure to file the Record on Appeal (FRAP 10, FRAP 11)
______ Missing motion information statement (T-1080 - Local Rule 27.1)
______ Missing supporting papers for motion (e.g, affidavit/affirmation/declaration) (FRAP 27)
______ Insufficient number of copies (Local Rules: 21.1, 27.1, 30.1, 31.1)
______ Improper proof of service (FRAP 25)
____________ Missing proof of service
____________ Served to an incorrect address
____________ Incomplete service (Anders v. California 386 U.S. 738 (1967))
______ Failure to submit document in digital format (Local Rule 25.1)
__X___ Not Text-Searchable (Local Rule 25.1, Local Rules 25.2), click here for instructions on how to make PDFs text searchable
______ Failure to file appendix on CD-ROM (Local Rule 25.1, Local Rules 25.2)
______ Failure to file special appendix (Local Rule 32.1)
______ Defective cover (FRAP 32)
____________ Incorrect caption (FRAP 32)
____________ Wrong color cover (FRAP 32)
____________ Docket number font too small (Local Rule 32.1)
______ Incorrect pagination, click here for instructions on how to paginate PDFs (Local Rule 32.1)
______ Incorrect font (FRAP 32)
______ Failure to file the Record on Appeal (FRAP 10, FRAP 11)
______ Missing motion information statement (T-1080 - Local Rule 27.1)
______ Missing supporting papers for motion (e.g, affidavit/affirmation/declaration) (FRAP 27)
______ Insufficient number of copies (Local Rules: 21.1, 27.1, 30.1, 31.1)
______ Improper proof of service (FRAP 25)
____________ Missing proof of service
____________ Served to an incorrect address
____________ Incomplete service (Anders v. California 386 U.S. 738 (1967))
______ Failure to submit document in digital format (Local Rule 25.1)
__X___ Not Text-Searchable (Local Rule 25.1, Local Rules 25.2), click here for instructions on how to make PDFs text searchable
______ Failure to file appendix on CD-ROM (Local Rule 25.1, Local Rules 25.2)
______ Failure to file special appendix (Local Rule 32.1)
______ Defective cover (FRAP 32)
____________ Incorrect caption (FRAP 32)
____________ Wrong color cover (FRAP 32)
____________ Docket number font too small (Local Rule 32.1)
______ Incorrect pagination, click here for instructions on how to paginate PDFs (Local Rule 32.1)
______ Incorrect font (FRAP 32)
DOJ-OGR-00019824
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document