This is a page from a court transcript (US v. Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The text details a legal argument between the defense (Sternheim) and prosecution (Rohrbach) regarding the admissibility of evidence (exhibits 823 and 824) and hearsay concerns. The prosecution mentions Ms. Gill, the head of HR for Mar-a-Lago, noting she has reviewed a specific employment file relevant to the case.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the discussion regarding admissibility of evidence and testimony.
|
| Ms. Sternheim | Attorney (Defense) |
Arguing about hearsay regarding a witness's knowledge.
|
| Mr. Rohrbach | Attorney (Prosecution) |
Discussing exhibits 823/824 and the potential testimony of Ms. Gill.
|
| Ms. Gill | Head of HR for Mar-a-Lago |
Witness mentioned who has reviewed a specific employment file.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mar-a-Lago |
Employer where Ms. Gill is Head of HR.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting service.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (referenced in footer stamp).
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location associated with employment records being discussed.
|
"My current thinking is 823 comes in."Source
"Ms. Gill, as she's been the head of HR for Mar-a-Lago for quite a long time."Source
"She's reviewed this particular employment file, which is much larger than this set of records."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,624 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document