DOJ-OGR-00001014.jpg
526 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
526 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021, covering the arraignment of Ghislaine Maxwell on a superseding (S1) indictment. The prosecution (Ms. Moe) explains that the new indictment includes a 'ministerial correction' regarding civil docket numbers in the perjury counts (Five and Six). The Judge questions both Maxwell and her attorney, Mr. Cohen, to ensure they have reviewed and discussed the changes.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Moe | Prosecutor / Government Attorney |
Explaining the ministerial correction in the superseding indictment regarding perjury counts.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the arraignment on the S1 indictment.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Referred to as 'The Defendant' and 'Ms. Maxwell'; answering questions regarding whether she has seen the indictment.
|
| Mr. Cohen | Defense Attorney |
Attorney for Ms. Maxwell; confirming he discussed the indictment changes with his client.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Listed in footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Implied by footer code 'DOJ-OGR'.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2021-04-01
Arraignment on the S1 (Superseding) Indictment
Courtroom (Southern District)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by reporter's name (Southern District of New York).
|
Relationships (1)
Court asks Mr. Cohen if he discussed the indictment with Ms. Maxwell; Cohen confirms.
Key Quotes (4)
"The difference is a small ministerial correction, a reference to a civil docket number contained in the perjury counts, which are Counts Five and Six of the superseding indictment."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001014.jpg
Quote #1
"Ms. Maxwell, have you seen a copy of the S1 indictment in this matter?"Source
DOJ-OGR-00001014.jpg
Quote #2
"I saw the original indictment, your Honor."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001014.jpg
Quote #3
"Mr. Cohen, did you have an opportunity to discuss with Ms. Maxwell the ministerial change that was completed by way of the superseding indictment?"Source
DOJ-OGR-00001014.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,377 characters)
Case 21-770, Document 20-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page73 of 200 10
k7e2MaxC kjc
k7e2MaxC kjc
1 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.
2 The difference is a small ministerial correction, a
3 reference to a civil docket number contained in the perjury
4 counts, which are Counts Five and Six of the superseding
5 indictment. Aside from the alteration of those docket numbers,
6 the reference to them, there are no other changes to the
7 indictment.
8 THE COURT: All right. Again, I will conduct the
9 arraignment on the S1 indictment.
10 Ms. Maxwell, have you seen a copy of the S1 indictment
11 in this matter?
12 THE DEFENDANT: I saw the original indictment, your
13 Honor. The original --
14 THE COURT: Okay.
15 All right. Mr. Cohen, did you have an opportunity to
16 discuss with Ms. Maxwell the ministerial change that was
17 completed by way of the superseding indictment?
18 MR. COHEN: Yes, yes, Judge. We have, your Honor.
19 THE COURT: Any objection to proceeding on the
20 arraignment of the S1 indictment, Mr. Cohen?
21 MR. COHEN: No, your Honor.
22 THE COURT: All right.
23 Ms. Maxwell, have you had an opportunity to discuss
24 the indictment in this case with your attorney?
25 THE DEFENDANT: I have, your Honor.
2 The difference is a small ministerial correction, a
3 reference to a civil docket number contained in the perjury
4 counts, which are Counts Five and Six of the superseding
5 indictment. Aside from the alteration of those docket numbers,
6 the reference to them, there are no other changes to the
7 indictment.
8 THE COURT: All right. Again, I will conduct the
9 arraignment on the S1 indictment.
10 Ms. Maxwell, have you seen a copy of the S1 indictment
11 in this matter?
12 THE DEFENDANT: I saw the original indictment, your
13 Honor. The original --
14 THE COURT: Okay.
15 All right. Mr. Cohen, did you have an opportunity to
16 discuss with Ms. Maxwell the ministerial change that was
17 completed by way of the superseding indictment?
18 MR. COHEN: Yes, yes, Judge. We have, your Honor.
19 THE COURT: Any objection to proceeding on the
20 arraignment of the S1 indictment, Mr. Cohen?
21 MR. COHEN: No, your Honor.
22 THE COURT: All right.
23 Ms. Maxwell, have you had an opportunity to discuss
24 the indictment in this case with your attorney?
25 THE DEFENDANT: I have, your Honor.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00001014
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document