This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of Dr. Rocchio. The testimony focuses on the definition of 'grooming' in abuse cases, with Dr. Rocchio clarifying that grooming is not a single specific behavior but a 'series and a pattern of behavior' used to deceive a child and build trust for abuse. The questioning attorney attempts to establish that individual behaviors within that pattern can appear benign or non-grooming in isolation.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Dr. Rocchio | Witness / Expert |
Testifying under cross-examination regarding clinical/forensic definitions of grooming tactics.
|
| Unidentified Attorney (Q) | Attorney |
Conducting cross-examination, questioning the definition and identification of grooming behaviors.
|
| Judge (implied) | Judge |
Speaker of line 2: 'Overruled. You may finish.'
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Footer information.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice, indicated by the Bates stamp prefix 'DOJ-OGR'.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by court reporter location and case number structure (PAE refers to Judge Paul A. Engelmayer, SDNY).
|
"grooming is not a specific behavior. It's a series and a pattern of behavior that's taking into account the entire pattern."Source
"strategies that are commonly experienced by victims and utilized by offenders in the course of deceiving the child building a relationship of trust and then eventually sexually abusing the child."Source
"And so there are many things that we do that in hindsight one might say is grooming, but prospectively you can't tell whether or not it's grooming, right?"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,666 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document