This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It records a discussion between the Judge ('The Court'), Defense Attorney Pagliuca, and Prosecutor Comey regarding the admissibility of evidence connected to the testimony of Mr. Alessi and an anticipated witness. The discussion concludes with the court taking a recess.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the discussion regarding admissibility of testimony.
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Defense Attorney |
Representing the defense (Ghislaine Maxwell), clarifying the court's ruling.
|
| Ms. Comey | Prosecutor |
Representing the government.
|
| Mr. Alessi | Witness |
Mentioned regarding past testimony and admissibility of evidence.
|
| Rodgers | Witness |
Name appearing in the header 'Rodgers - direct', likely the witness on the stand or the subject of the examination se...
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting firm.
|
|
| Government |
The prosecution team.
|
|
| Defense |
The defense team.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (stamped in footer).
|
"Having not admitted it pending what all along had been the government's proffer as to the anticipated testimony of an anticipated witness, I didn't admit it following Mr. Alessi's testimony."Source
"Obviously, both sides have reargued many issues and I keep an open mind."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,269 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document