DOJ-OGR-00013407.jpg

528 KB

Extraction Summary

5
People
4
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 528 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It records a discussion between the Judge ('The Court'), Defense Attorney Pagliuca, and Prosecutor Comey regarding the admissibility of evidence connected to the testimony of Mr. Alessi and an anticipated witness. The discussion concludes with the court taking a recess.

People (5)

Name Role Context
The Court Judge
Presiding over the discussion regarding admissibility of testimony.
Mr. Pagliuca Defense Attorney
Representing the defense (Ghislaine Maxwell), clarifying the court's ruling.
Ms. Comey Prosecutor
Representing the government.
Mr. Alessi Witness
Mentioned regarding past testimony and admissibility of evidence.
Rodgers Witness
Name appearing in the header 'Rodgers - direct', likely the witness on the stand or the subject of the examination se...

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Court reporting firm.
Government
The prosecution team.
Defense
The defense team.
DOJ
Department of Justice (stamped in footer).

Timeline (2 events)

August 10, 2022
Filing date of the transcript document.
Unknown (Trial Date)
Court recess taken after discussion between counsel and judge.
Courtroom

Relationships (2)

Mr. Pagliuca Attorney-Judge The Court
Dialogue in transcript.
Ms. Comey Attorney-Judge The Court
Dialogue in transcript.

Key Quotes (2)

"Having not admitted it pending what all along had been the government's proffer as to the anticipated testimony of an anticipated witness, I didn't admit it following Mr. Alessi's testimony."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00013407.jpg
Quote #1
"Obviously, both sides have reargued many issues and I keep an open mind."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00013407.jpg
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,269 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 129 of 262 1834
LC8Cmax5 Rodgers - direct
1 THE COURT: I'll consider it after you confer, but you
2 know where it was. And that's all I have.
3 MR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, on that point, I'm assuming
4 what the Court means is if there is a new issue raised that
5 wasn't raised during the examination is the problem. Is that
6 what the Court is alluding to?
7 THE COURT: Having not admitted it pending what all
8 along had been the government's proffer as to the anticipated
9 testimony of an anticipated witness, I didn't admit it
10 following Mr. Alessi's testimony. It's true that there was
11 voir dire on it, but I don't know what new argument will be
12 asserted, and it strikes me that the fact that it -- whatever
13 argument is being made in the absence of the witness could be
14 an issue.
15 MR. PAGLIUCA: Right. That's what I understand. That
16 was my understanding. I get it.
17 THE COURT: I'm open to arguments. Obviously, both
18 sides have reargued many issues and I keep an open mind.
19 Anything else?
20 MS. COMEY: Not from the government, your Honor.
21 MR. PAGLIUCA: Nothing from the defense, your Honor.
22 (Recess)
23
24
25
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013407

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document