DOJ-OGR-00013969.jpg

624 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript (testimony)
File Size: 624 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Loftus (likely Dr. Elizabeth Loftus), who is explaining the scientific peer review process and her experience serving on editorial boards for psychology journals. The document appears to be part of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial records.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Loftus Witness / Expert Witness
Testifying under direct examination regarding scientific methodology, peer review, and her experience on editorial bo...
Unidentified Attorney (Q) Interrogator
Conducting direct examination of the witness.
Jury Audience
The group being addressed by the witness's explanation.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Court reporting agency listed in the footer.
DOJ
Department of Justice (inferred from footer stamp DOJ-OGR).

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
Direct examination testimony of witness Loftus in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell).
Courtroom (Southern District of New York)
Loftus Attorney

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied jurisdiction based on case number format and court reporter name.

Relationships (1)

Loftus Professional/Editorial Various Scientific Journals
Witness states: "I've served on the editorial board of many journals."

Key Quotes (2)

"Journals that are peer-reviewed journals generally have an editorial board."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00013969.jpg
Quote #1
"But over the years, many of the major journals in the field of psychology."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00013969.jpg
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,597 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 110 of 246 2405
LCGVMAX3 Loftus - direct
1 A. Generally, when we do an experiment or a set of
2 experiments, we will write up a scientific publication, submit
3 it hopefully to a peer-reviewed journal where it will undergo
4 peer review and then be published and be part of the scientific
5 literature so that it's available for other people to have
6 access to.
7 Q. Please, in a very simple fashion, describe to the jury what
8 the peer review process is.
9 A. Journals that are peer-reviewed journals generally have an
10 editorial board. Members of the scientific community that will
11 review a manuscript that has been submitted for publication,
12 will review that manuscript and will make recommendations to
13 the editor about whether this manuscript is worthy of being
14 published. Is it scientifically sound, is it sufficiently
15 interesting, is it appropriate for the journal, helping the
16 editor to make that -- or should it be rejected, because it's
17 none of those things.
18 Q. In addition to your submission of your own reports to
19 peer-reviewed journals, have you had the occasion to serve on
20 the editorial boards of any peer-reviewed journals?
21 A. Well, over these years I've served on the editorial board
22 of many journals. And even today I am still on the editorial
23 board of a few journals. But over the years, many of the major
24 journals in the field of psychology.
25 Q. In the course of your career, have you been a member of any
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013969

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document