A page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) dated August 10, 2022. During the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers, attorney Mr. Pagliuca objects to a line of questioning, arguing that moving to a smaller apartment does not prove a lack of money. The Court overrules the objection.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Epstein | Subject |
Mentioned in testimony regarding when 'she' first met him.
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Attorney |
Raises an objection regarding lack of foundation for a claim about money and housing.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Overrules Mr. Pagliuca's objection.
|
| Rodgers | Witness |
Identified in the header 'Rodgers - direct', indicating this is their direct examination.
|
| She | Subject |
Unidentified female subject of the testimony regarding her meeting Epstein and her living situation.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting agency listed in the footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00013387).
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Generic location mentioned in the context of the legal argument about financial status.
|
Complete text extracted from the document (473 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document