DOJ-OGR-00009648.jpg
508 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
0
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing / court correspondence
File Size:
508 KB
Summary
This document is page 11 of a legal filing (Document 636) from March 1, 2022, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains a list of proposed questions (numbers 19 and 20) addressed to an individual (likely a juror) regarding their answers on a jury questionnaire. Specifically, it probes whether the individual read, understood, and truthfully answered 'Question 25' regarding being a victim of a crime, noting that the individual answered 'No'.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
Recipient of the document/filing (The Honorable)
|
| Unnamed Juror/Witness | Subject of questioning |
Addressed as 'You' in the proposed questions regarding their questionnaire responses
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Indicated by footer 'DOJ-OGR'
|
|
| US District Court |
Implied by Case number 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (US v. Ghislaine Maxwell)
|
Timeline (1 events)
Key Quotes (3)
"Those questions included Question 25, which asked you if you were the victim of a crime?"Source
DOJ-OGR-00009648.jpg
Quote #1
"You responded “No” to each of those questions?"Source
DOJ-OGR-00009648.jpg
Quote #2
"Please look at pages 11-13 of the questionnaire. That is the section entitled “Experience as a Witness, Defendant, or Crime Victim”?"Source
DOJ-OGR-00009648.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,379 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 636 Filed 03/01/22 Page 11 of 22
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
March 1, 2022
Page 11
March 1, 2022
Page 11
19. Please look at pages 11-13 of the questionnaire. That is the section entitled
“Experience as a Witness, Defendant, or Crime Victim”?
“Experience as a Witness, Defendant, or Crime Victim”?
a. Those questions explored whether you or a relative or a close friend had any
experiences with the legal system or with law enforcement or with being a
crime victim that might prevent you from being a fair and impartial juror?
experiences with the legal system or with law enforcement or with being a
crime victim that might prevent you from being a fair and impartial juror?
b. Each of those questions had multiple parts?
c. If you answered “yes,” to any of those questions, you would have to provide
further information and potentially a written explanation?
further information and potentially a written explanation?
d. You read those questions?
e. You understood those questions?
f. Those questions included Question 25, which asked you if you were the victim
of a crime?
of a crime?
g. You responded “No” to each of those questions?
h. You didn’t respond to any of the sub-questions that asked for further
information if you answered “Yes” to the first question?
information if you answered “Yes” to the first question?
i. You skipped those?
j. Because you had read the initial question and the follow-up questions closely
and realized that you didn’t need to answer the follow-up questions if you
answered “no” to the first question?
and realized that you didn’t need to answer the follow-up questions if you
answered “no” to the first question?
20. Please look at pages 19-21 of the questionnaire. That is the section entitled
“Knowledge of the Case and People”?
“Knowledge of the Case and People”?
2100689.3
DOJ-OGR-00009648
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document