This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 2:02-cr-00388-PAE) featuring the testimony of a witness named Schoeman. The testimony transitions from direct examination by Mr. Shechtman to cross-examination by Mr. Okula. The questioning focuses on establishing the timeline of a conversation Schoeman had with Ms. Trzaskoma relative to the receipt of a juror's note during deliberations.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Schoeman | Witness |
Testifying under direct and cross-examination regarding a conversation and timeline of events.
|
| Mr. Shechtman | Attorney |
Concludes direct examination of the witness.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the proceedings, calls for cross-examination.
|
| Mr. Okula | Attorney |
Conducts cross-examination of Mr. Schoeman.
|
| Dr. DeRosa | Mentioned Person |
Referenced by Mr. Okula as sending regards to the witness.
|
| Ms. Trzaskoma | Mentioned Person |
Person with whom Mr. Schoeman had a conversation.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Listed in the footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where 'the note was received'.
|
|
|
Implied jurisdiction based on the reporter's name.
|
"I believe it was during the deliberations either that Friday or sometime the following week."Source
"You said you had this conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma after the note was received in court, is that correct?"Source
"Dr. DeRosa sends his regards?"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,200 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document