This document is a page from a court transcript (filed Dec 8, 2021) discussing pre-trial motions in limine. The Court discusses the schedule for ruling on the Government's motion to exclude the testimony of defense expert witnesses Drs. Loftus and Dietz (likely Elizabeth Loftus and Park Dietz). The text also mentions disputes regarding Government Exhibit 52 and the introduction of co-conspirator statements, with a final pretrial conference scheduled for November 23.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Dr. Loftus | Defense Expert Witness |
Subject of government motion to exclude testimony pursuant to 702 and Daubert.
|
| Dr. Dietz | Defense Expert Witness |
Subject of government motion to exclude testimony pursuant to 702 and Daubert.
|
| The Court | Judge/Speaker |
Presiding over the hearing, setting schedules for rulings and briefings.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Footer information.
|
|
| Government |
Filed motions to exclude testimony.
|
|
| Defense |
Responsible for filing responses and motion in limine.
|
|
| DOJ |
Indicated by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by court reporter name (likely SDNY).
|
"we have the government's motion to exclude the testimony, or some of the testimony at least, of Drs. Loftus and Dietz pursuant to 702 and Daubert."Source
"We also have not yet fully briefed the defendant's seventh motion in limine which relates to Government Exhibit 52"Source
"the defendant's first motion in limine related to introduction of co-conspirator statements."Source
"I will either rule by written order or address those at the November 23 final pretrial conference."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,480 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document