DOJ-OGR-00014701.jpg
594 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
594 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between defense attorney Mr. Everdell and the Court regarding a jury note. The debate centers on whether Ghislaine Maxwell can be held criminally liable for arranging a return flight from New Mexico for a victim named 'Jane,' distinguishing the intent of the return flight from the initial flight to the location where sexual abuse allegedly occurred.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Everdell | Defense Attorney |
Arguing regarding the interpretation of a jury note concerning transportation and liability.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the discussion, expressing confusion over the jury's note.
|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the discussion regarding whether she can be held accountable for arranging flights.
|
| Mr. Epstein | Associate/Co-conspirator |
Mentioned in the context of the return flight being 'somewhere away from Mr. Epstein'.
|
| Jane | Victim/Witness (Pseudonym) |
Mentioned as the person involved in alleged sexual abuse and the subject of transportation to New Mexico.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Listed in the footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice, indicated in the footer stamp (DOJ-OGR).
|
Timeline (3 events)
2022-08-10
Court proceedings regarding jury instructions and notes.
Courtroom (Southern District)
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of the ranch/property where flights were directed to and from.
|
|
|
Southern District of New York (implied by Southern District Reporters).
|
Relationships (2)
Discussion of Maxwell arranging flights for Jane for the purpose of sexual activity.
Mention of flying 'away from Mr. Epstein'.
Key Quotes (4)
"I think this is a question about whether you can hold her accountable for a return flight, if you believe that she had something to do with arranging that return flight from New Mexico"Source
DOJ-OGR-00014701.jpg
Quote #1
"the first flight to New Mexico may have been -- at least there's some testimony to consider about whether that was for the purpose of illegal sexual activity."Source
DOJ-OGR-00014701.jpg
Quote #2
"It was not true of the return flight, the flight back, wherever she was going, home, somewhere else, somewhere away from Mr. Epstein."Source
DOJ-OGR-00014701.jpg
Quote #3
"But it says where/if the intent was to engage -- for Jane to engage in sexual activity."Source
DOJ-OGR-00014701.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,518 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 773 Filed 08/10/22 Page 15 of 29 3132
LCRVMAXT
LCRVMAXT
1 entire note seems to be about transportation of some kind. And
2 so we would propose just referring them to the instruction in
3 its entirety.
4 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I don't find this note
5 confusing. And I think simply saying it's confusing --
6 THE COURT: Well, I find it confusing. For example, I
7 don't know if this is a question about aiding and abetting. I
8 don't know.
9 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I think this is pretty -- I
10 think this is a question about whether you can hold her
11 accountable for a return flight, if you believe that she had
12 something to do with arranging that return flight from New
13 Mexico; whereas the first flight to New Mexico may have been --
14 at least there's some testimony to consider about whether that
15 was for the purpose of illegal sexual activity. It was not
16 true of the return flight, the flight back, wherever she was
17 going, home, somewhere else, somewhere away from Mr. Epstein.
18 I think they are asking, Can we consider if Ms.
19 Maxwell had anything to do with that flight, arranging of that
20 flight, whether she can be convicted, because it's on the
21 return trip from an area where Jane claims she was involved in
22 sexual abuse.
23 THE COURT: But it says where/if the intent was to
24 engage -- for Jane to engage in sexual activity.
25 MR. EVERDELL: Right. They are saying with a flight
2 so we would propose just referring them to the instruction in
3 its entirety.
4 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I don't find this note
5 confusing. And I think simply saying it's confusing --
6 THE COURT: Well, I find it confusing. For example, I
7 don't know if this is a question about aiding and abetting. I
8 don't know.
9 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I think this is pretty -- I
10 think this is a question about whether you can hold her
11 accountable for a return flight, if you believe that she had
12 something to do with arranging that return flight from New
13 Mexico; whereas the first flight to New Mexico may have been --
14 at least there's some testimony to consider about whether that
15 was for the purpose of illegal sexual activity. It was not
16 true of the return flight, the flight back, wherever she was
17 going, home, somewhere else, somewhere away from Mr. Epstein.
18 I think they are asking, Can we consider if Ms.
19 Maxwell had anything to do with that flight, arranging of that
20 flight, whether she can be convicted, because it's on the
21 return trip from an area where Jane claims she was involved in
22 sexual abuse.
23 THE COURT: But it says where/if the intent was to
24 engage -- for Jane to engage in sexual activity.
25 MR. EVERDELL: Right. They are saying with a flight
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00014701
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document