Extraction Summary

7
People
4
Organizations
4
Locations
4
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal motion (unopposed motion for extension of time)
File Size: 139 KB
Summary

This document is an 'Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time' filed on August 7, 2009, in the case of Jane Doe No. 101 v. Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of Florida. Epstein's legal team requests an extension until October 15, 2009, to reply to the Plaintiff's response to the motion to dismiss, citing that the parties are working together to find a resolution. The motion lists legal counsel for both sides, including attorneys from Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, and Podhurst Orseck.

People (7)

Name Role Context
Jeffrey Epstein Defendant
Seeking extension of time to reply to Plaintiff's response.
Jane Doe No. 101 Plaintiff
Party suing Epstein; her counsel agreed to the extension.
Robert D. Critton, Jr. Attorney for Defendant
Signed the motion; affiliated with Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman.
Michael J. Pike Attorney for Defendant
Listed on signature block; affiliated with Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman.
Jack Alan Goldberger Attorney for Defendant
Listed on Service List; affiliated with Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
Robert C. Josefsberg Attorney for Plaintiff
Listed on Service List; affiliated with Podhurst Orseck, P.A.
Katherine W. Ezell Attorney for Plaintiff
Listed on Service List; affiliated with Podhurst Orseck, P.A.

Timeline (4 events)

2009-05-01
Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint [DE 9].
Southern District of Florida
2009-05-26
Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint [DE 29].
Southern District of Florida
2009-06-26
Plaintiff filed Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint [DE 56].
Southern District of Florida
2009-08-07
Filing of Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time.
Southern District of Florida
Jeffrey Epstein Robert D. Critton Jr.

Relationships (2)

Jeffrey Epstein Legal Adversaries Jane Doe No. 101
Defendant vs Plaintiff in Case No. 09-80591-MARRA/JOHNSON
Robert D. Critton Jr. Attorney-Client Jeffrey Epstein
Signed as Attorney for Defendant

Key Quotes (2)

"The parties continue to work together to find a resolution in this case."
Source
070.pdf
Quote #1
"Defendant seeks an extension until October 15, 2009, to file his reply."
Source
070.pdf
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (3,488 characters)

Case 9:09-cv-80591-KAM Document 70 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/07/2009 Page 1 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO.: 09-80591-MARRA/JOHNSON
JANE DOE No. 101,
Plaintiff,
v.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant,
DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION
OF TIME IN WHICH TO FILE A REPLY TO PLAINTIFF JANE DOE 101'S RESPONSE
TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT
Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, (hereinafter "Epstein") by and through his undersigned
attorneys, respectfully moves this Court for an extension of time in which to reply to
Plaintiff, Jane Doe 101's Response to Defendant, Epstein's Motion to Dismiss Amended
Complaint [DE 56] dated June 26, 2009. Defendant seeks an extension until October
15, 2009, to file his reply. As good cause in support of granting the motion, Defendant
states:
1. On May 1, 2009, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint [DE 9].
2. On May 26, 2009, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint [DE
29].
3. On June 26, 2009, Plaintiff filed her Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss
Amended Complaint [DE 56].
Case 9:09-cv-80591-KAM Document 70 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/07/2009 Page 2 of 3
Doe 101 v. Epstein
Page 2
4. Defendant's Reply to Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss
Amended Complaint is currently due on August 21, 2009.
5. The parties continue to work together to find a resolution in this case.
6. The requested extension is fair and reasonable under the circumstances as it will
provide time to allow the Defendant, EPSTEIN, to fully and adequately respond.
7. As certified below, counsel for Defendant conferred with counsel for Plaintiff, and
Plaintiff's counsel is in agreement with the requested extension.
WHEREFORE Defendant respectfully requests that this Court enter an Order
granting an extension until October 15, 2009, to file a Reply to Plaintiff's Response to
Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint.
Local Rule 7.1 Statement
Counsel for the movant conferred by telephone and correspondence with
counsel for the Plaintiff and Counsel for Plaintiff is in agreement with the requested
extension until October 15, 2009 for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint.
Robert D. Critton Jr., Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Certificate of Service
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with
the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being
served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in the
manner specified by CM/ECF on this 7th day of August, 2009
Case 9:09-cv-80591-KAM Document 70 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/07/2009 Page 3 of 3
Doe 101 v. Epstein
Page 3
Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq.
Katherine W. Ezell, Esq.
Podhurst Orseck, P.A.
25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800
Miami, FL 33130
305 358-2800
Fax: 305 358-2382
rjosefsberg@podhurst.com
kezell@podhurst.com
Counsel for Plaintiff
Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq.
Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue South
Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012
561-659-8300
Fax: 561-835-8691
jagesg@bellsouth.net
Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
Respectfully submitted,
By:
ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ.
Florida Bar No. 224162
rcrit@bclclaw.com
MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ.
Florida Bar No. 617296
mpike@bclclaw.com
BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN
515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
561/842-2820 Phone
561/515-3148 Fax
(Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document