This document is a page from a court transcript in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (implied by context and LCGVMAX1 code). Defense attorney Mr. Everdell argues that photographs sent by a witness ('Jane') to Ms. Espinosa, an employee who worked in Epstein's office daily, should be admitted as evidence to show 'Jane' maintained relationships with Epstein's circle after claiming to flee. Prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz counters that the evidence is irrelevant because the witness already acknowledged maintaining such relationships during direct examination.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Everdell | Defense Attorney |
Arguing for the admission of photographic evidence to impeach the witness.
|
| Ms. Pomerantz | Prosecutor |
Arguing against the relevance of the photographic evidence.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the arguments and clarifying the prosecution's stance.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Alleged Abuser |
Mentioned as the 'alleged abuser' and the person 'Jane' fled from.
|
| Ms. Espinosa | Epstein Employee |
Worked in Epstein's office every day; maintained contact with 'Jane'.
|
| Jane | Witness/Victim |
Pseudonym for the witness whose testimony and credibility are being debated.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location 'Jane' claimed to have fled.
|
|
|
Workplace of Ms. Espinosa.
|
"if she claims that she left New York and she fled this life with Epstein... this is evidence that she was keeping contact with people in his orbit."Source
"Ms. Espinosa worked in his office and was there with him in the office every day."Source
"She voluntarily sent these photographs to her showing that she maintained that relationship voluntarily"Source
"Jane's testimony was that she herself acknowledged that she had maintained a relationship with some of the individuals"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,497 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document