This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a discussion between a judge and an attorney, Ms. Moe. The conversation centers on the admissibility of 'Government Exhibit 52,' with the judge deciding not to preclude it before trial. They clarify the nature of anticipated testimony from a witness, Ms. Comey, who is expected to authenticate the exhibit by describing its similarity to a book she has seen, even though she is unaware of how the government obtained it.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Comey | Witness |
Mentioned as the witness whose anticipated testimony is being discussed. She is expected to authenticate an exhibit b...
|
| Ms. Moe | Attorney |
A speaker in the transcript, likely an attorney, who is clarifying the details of a witness's testimony to the court.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
A speaker in the transcript, the judge presiding over the case, who is questioning Ms. Moe to understand the nature o...
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Appears at the bottom of the transcript, indicating the court reporting agency that transcribed the proceedings.
|
"I'm not going to preclude, but I do think this needs to play out at trial. I need to hear the witness testimony and I'll allow voir dire, given factually what I understand to be the issues surrounding this item..."Source
"The anticipated testimony, Ms. Comey -- this is for you, Ms. Comey -- the anticipated testimony is that not this exact book but a similar-looking book, characteristically similar, binding, pages, font, etc., was seen by this witness, and she can attempt to authenticate by describing the similarities between what is Government Exhibit 52 and what she saw."Source
"Because this witness has not been informed about how that exhibit came into the government's possession, I just wanted to clarify one small thing, which is that this witness won't say that this isn't one of the -- you know, in particular, that because she recognizes it as one in a series, but doesn't know how it came to the government's possession, it's just identifying it in that way."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,817 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document