DOJ-OGR-00010079.jpg
426 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
1
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
426 KB
Summary
This document is a transcript of a legal proceeding where a witness named Edelstein is being questioned about their knowledge of Catherine Conrad, a suspended New York attorney. The questioning focuses on whether Edelstein could have researched Conrad on May 12th and clarifies that Edelstein's information came from Theresa Trzaskoma, who stated Conrad was a suspended lawyer but did not mention a specific 'suspension report'.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Edelstein | Witness |
Appears to be the witness being questioned, as indicated by the name at the top and the answers (A.) provided.
|
| Ms. Conrad |
Mentioned as the subject of potential computer research on May 12th. Her phone number was not available on that date.
|
|
| MR. SCHECTMAN | Attorney |
Interjects to defend the witness's answer, suggesting he is the witness's counsel.
|
| Catherine Conrad | Suspended Attorney |
Mentioned as the subject of a suspension report and as a suspended New York attorney. Likely the full name for 'Ms. C...
|
| Theresa Trzaskoma |
Mentioned as the person who allegedly informed the witness about a suspension report for Catherine Conrad.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding.
|
Timeline (3 events)
A witness, Edelstein, is questioned by an attorney about their knowledge of Catherine Conrad's professional status.
Theresa Trzaskoma told the witness (Edelstein) that there was a suspended lawyer named Catherine Conrad.
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in the first line of testimony, possibly in relation to a phone number or address.
|
|
|
Mentioned in the context of Catherine Conrad being a "suspended New York attorney".
|
Relationships (1)
Theresa Trzaskoma provided information to Edelstein regarding Catherine Conrad's status as a suspended lawyer.
Key Quotes (2)
"There's nothing unintelligible about the answer, if you would allow the witness to finish."Source
— MR. SCHECTMAN
(An objection made to the questioner, defending the witness's attempt to provide a more detailed answer.)
DOJ-OGR-00010079.jpg
Quote #1
"What I said was she had told me there was a suspended lawyer with the name Catherine Conrad. She did not mention a"Source
— Edelstein (A.)
(The witness clarifying what they were told by Theresa Trzaskoma, distinguishing between being told about a 'suspended lawyer' versus a 'suspension report'.)
DOJ-OGR-00010079.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,355 characters)
Case 2:20-cr-00033-B9-AEN Document 646-22 Filed 02/22/22 Page 114 of 330
A-5796
A-5796
C2GFDAU3
339
Edelstein
1 Bronxville, but the same phone number.
2 Q. You would agree with me, would you not, that that's the
3 very same computer research over the course of a couple of
4 minutes that you could have done on May 12th, right?
5 A. Well, one could have done that on May 12th. We didn't have
6 Ms. Conrad's phone number on May 12.
7 Q. So the answer is yes, you could have done that research on
8 May 12th, right?
9 A. I could have done a Google search --
10 Q. Was there something unintelligible about my question?
11 MR. SCHECTMAN: There's nothing unintelligible about
12 the answer, if you would allow the witness to finish.
13 THE COURT: Overruled.
14 Q. Could you answer? Could you have done that research on
15 May 12?
16 A. No. I can explain.
17 Q. Well, you were informed there was a Catherine Conrad
18 suspension report by Theresa Trzaskoma, correct?
19 A. No.
20 Q. Didn't Theresa Trzaskoma tell you that she had seen
21 evidence that there was a suspended New York attorney named
22 Catherine Conrad? Didn't you just tell that to us a few
23 minutes ago?
24 A. No. What I said was she had told me there was a suspended
25 lawyer with the name Catherine Conrad. She did not mention a
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
339
Edelstein
1 Bronxville, but the same phone number.
2 Q. You would agree with me, would you not, that that's the
3 very same computer research over the course of a couple of
4 minutes that you could have done on May 12th, right?
5 A. Well, one could have done that on May 12th. We didn't have
6 Ms. Conrad's phone number on May 12.
7 Q. So the answer is yes, you could have done that research on
8 May 12th, right?
9 A. I could have done a Google search --
10 Q. Was there something unintelligible about my question?
11 MR. SCHECTMAN: There's nothing unintelligible about
12 the answer, if you would allow the witness to finish.
13 THE COURT: Overruled.
14 Q. Could you answer? Could you have done that research on
15 May 12?
16 A. No. I can explain.
17 Q. Well, you were informed there was a Catherine Conrad
18 suspension report by Theresa Trzaskoma, correct?
19 A. No.
20 Q. Didn't Theresa Trzaskoma tell you that she had seen
21 evidence that there was a suspended New York attorney named
22 Catherine Conrad? Didn't you just tell that to us a few
23 minutes ago?
24 A. No. What I said was she had told me there was a suspended
25 lawyer with the name Catherine Conrad. She did not mention a
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00010079
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document