This document is a page from a legal text (likely a law journal article or brief by David Schoen) submitted to the House Oversight Committee. It critiques a 2011 Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) memorandum which argued that Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) rights only attach after formal criminal proceedings are initiated. The text argues this position is 'unpersuasive' and 'disingenuous' because the DOJ routinely identifies victims earlier, such as during grand jury investigations or under the VRRA of 1990.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| David Schoen | Attorney / Author |
Name appears in the footer, identifying him as the submitter or author of the legal argument.
|
| Jon Kyl | Senator (implied) |
Referenced in Footnote 82 regarding a letter related to the OLC CVRA Rights Memo.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Department of Justice |
Referred to as 'The Justice Department' and 'The Department'; criticized for its position on CVRA rights.
|
|
| OLC |
Office of Legal Counsel; entity that released the 2011 memorandum being critiqued.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017615'.
|
"OLC's analysis is unpersuasive."Source
"OLC is disingenuous in asserting that the 'first point' at which a person has been harmed by a federal crime arises only after a criminal complaint has been filed."Source
"Indeed, OLC remarkably ignores the fact that the Department is directly required to identify victims of a crime before the filing of a criminal complaint, both by statute and through internal policy directives."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (4,095 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document