DOJ-OGR-00017756.jpg

459 KB

Extraction Summary

5
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 459 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The questioning focuses on a claim Jane made against Ms. Maxwell via a 'claims program,' which resulted in an initial offer of $5 million. The witness confirms receiving the offer and a subsequent wire transfer, but suggests the amount wired was not the full $5 million.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Jane Witness
The person being cross-examined, as indicated by 'Jane - Cross' in the header. She is answering questions about a cla...
Epstein
Mentioned in a question to the witness: 'abused by any individuals other than Epstein, correct?'
MS. MOE Attorney
Objects to a question by stating, 'Your Honor, we're now reading a document that is not in evidence.'
Your Honor Judge
Addressed by MS. MOE and rules on an objection ('THE COURT: Sustained.').
Ms. Maxwell
The subject of a claim made by the witness: 'you were making a claim against Ms. Maxwell?'

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
THE COURT government agency
Referenced as the entity that sustained an objection.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the proceedings.

Timeline (3 events)

2022-08-10
Cross-examination of a witness named Jane regarding a claim she made against Ms. Maxwell and a subsequent $5 million offer and payment.
Courtroom
Jane MS. MOE THE COURT Unnamed Questioner
The witness, Jane, made a claim against Ms. Maxwell through a claims program.
Jane Ms. Maxwell claims program
A claims program made an initial offer of $5 million to the witness, Jane.
Jane claims program

Relationships (3)

Jane adversarial Ms. Maxwell
Jane made a claim against Ms. Maxwell through a claims program.
Jane victim-abuser (implied) Epstein
The questioning implies Jane may have been abused by Epstein ('abused by any individuals other than Epstein, correct?').
Jane professional Jane's attorney
The question 'Do you know whether your attorney went back and asked for more money?' indicates Jane had legal representation.

Key Quotes (3)

"Your Honor, we're now reading a document that is not in evidence."
Source
— MS. MOE (An objection made during the cross-examination.)
DOJ-OGR-00017756.jpg
Quote #1
"$5 million."
Source
— Jane (The witness's answer when asked about the amount of the initial offer from the claims program.)
DOJ-OGR-00017756.jpg
Quote #2
"Well, not the entirety, no."
Source
— Jane (The witness's response when asked if she was wired $5 million, implying she received less than the full amount.)
DOJ-OGR-00017756.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,054 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 147 of 264
LC1Qmax4 Jane - Cross
1 abused by any individuals other than Epstein, correct?
2 MS. MOE: Your Honor, we're now reading a document
3 that is not in evidence.
4 THE COURT: Sustained.
5 Q. Do you recall answering or telling the claims program that
6 you were making a claim against Ms. Maxwell?
7 A. Yes.
8 Q. And you were ultimately made an offer by the claims
9 program, right?
10 A. Yes.
11 Q. And you were told what that offer was?
12 A. Yes.
13 Q. What was that initial offer?
14 A. $5 million.
15 Q. Do you know whether your attorney went back and asked for
16 more money?
17 A. I don't know that.
18 Q. This year you were wired the money, right, $5 million?
19 A. Well, not the entirety, no.
20 Q. I would like to ask you to take a look at Exhibit J-40. Do
21 you recognize this document?
22 A. Yes.
23 Q. And do you recognize the date of the document?
24 A. Yes.
25 Q. Do you recognize your name on the document?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017756

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document