DOJ-OGR-00001432.jpg

583 KB

Extraction Summary

6
People
3
Organizations
3
Locations
4
Events
4
Relationships
0
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 583 KB
Summary

This document is a court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated April 27, 2021, regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The court affirms the lower District Court's decisions from December 28, 2020, and March 22, 2021, and denies Maxwell's appeal for bail pending trial. The order also notes that Maxwell's complaints about sleep deprivation while incarcerated should be addressed to the District Court.

People (6)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant-Appellant
The subject of the court order, appealing the denial of her requests for bail pending trial.
PIERRE N. LEVAL Circuit Judge
One of the three judges presiding over the appeal.
RAYMOND J. LOHIER, JR. Circuit Judge
One of the three judges presiding over the appeal.
RICHARD J. SULLIVAN Circuit Judge
One of the three judges presiding over the appeal.
Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe Clerk of Court
The Clerk of Court for the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, who certified the order.
Thurgood Marshall
Mentioned as the namesake of the United States Courthouse where the court was held.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Government Agency
The court that issued this order.
United States of America Government
The Appellee in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell.
District Court Government Agency
The lower court whose orders denying bail were being appealed.

Timeline (4 events)

2020-12-28
The District Court entered an order denying Ghislaine Maxwell's request for bail pending trial.
District Court
2021-03-22
The District Court entered a second order denying Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed request for bail pending trial.
District Court
2021-04-27
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the District Court's orders and denied Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for bail.
Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse
During oral argument, counsel for Appellant expressed concern that Appellant was improperly being deprived of sleep while incarcerated.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Ghislaine Maxwell's counsel

Locations (3)

Location Context
The location where the court session was held.
The address of the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse.
The city where the courthouse is located.

Relationships (4)

Ghislaine Maxwell is the Defendant-Appellant in the case 'United States v. Maxwell', where the United States of America is the Appellee.
Ghislaine Maxwell Professional PIERRE N. LEVAL
Pierre N. Leval was one of the Circuit Judges who ruled on Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal.
Raymond J. Lohier, Jr. was one of the Circuit Judges who ruled on Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal.
Ghislaine Maxwell Professional RICHARD J. SULLIVAN
Richard J. Sullivan was one of the Circuit Judges who ruled on Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal.

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,514 characters)

Case 20-27-00330-Amended Document 72562 Filed 04/29/21 Page 326 of 4
21-58-cr (L), 21-770-cr
United States v. Maxwell
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE
SECOND CIRCUIT
At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 27th day of April, two thousand twenty-one.
PRESENT: PIERRE N. LEVAL,
RAYMOND J. LOHIER, JR.,
RICHARD J. SULLIVAN,
Circuit Judges.
United States of America,
Appellee,
v.
21-58-cr (L)
21-770-cr
Ghislaine Maxwell, AKA Sealed Defendant 1,
Defendant-Appellant.
Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell appeals from orders of the District Court entered December 28, 2020 and March 22, 2021, which denied her renewed requests for bail pending trial. See Dkts. 1, 20. Upon due consideration, it is hereby ORDERED that the District Court’s orders are AFFIRMED and that Appellant’s motion for bail, or in the alternative, temporary pretrial release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i), Dkt. 39, is DENIED. During oral argument, counsel for Appellant expressed concern that Appellant was improperly being deprived of sleep while incarcerated. To the extent Appellant seeks relief specific to her sleeping conditions, such request should be addressed to the District Court.
FOR THE COURT:
Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk of Court
[Signature of Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe]
[Seal of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit]
EXHIBIT A
DOJ-OGR-00001432

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document