HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026751.jpg
1.3 MB
Extraction Summary
5
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email chain
File Size:
1.3 MB
Summary
An email chain from August 2017 in which Masha Drokova forwards a conversation with scientist Martin Nowak to Jeffrey Epstein. Drokova had sent Nowak a series of interview questions specifically asking about the details of Epstein's funding of Nowak's work, potential publications in Nature or Science, and the ethics of scientist funding sources. The document appears to be part of House Oversight materials.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Masha Drokova | Sender |
Sending questions to Martin Nowak and forwarding the correspondence to Jeffrey Epstein.
|
| Jeffrey E. | Recipient |
Received the forwarded email chain via jeevacation@gmail.com.
|
| Martin A. Nowak | Subject |
Scientist being interviewed/questioned by Masha Drokova regarding his work and funding.
|
| EO Wilson | Mentioned |
Mentioned as a potential critic of Nowak's ideas on evolution.
|
| Trump | Mentioned |
Referenced in a question regarding changes in science funding.
|
Timeline (1 events)
Late July 2017
Relationships (2)
Masha forwards her correspondence with Nowak directly to Epstein, presumably for review or awareness.
Email asks 'What specifically did Epstein fund that allowed you to make an advancement...'
Key Quotes (3)
"What specifically did Epstein fund that allowed you to make an advancement in applying math to complicated systems, right?"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026751.jpg
Quote #1
"Would you be ok with the angle about how much scientist should care about where their funding comes from? It’s a hot topic given this story"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026751.jpg
Quote #2
"How has funding for your field and for you changed under Trump?"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026751.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,704 characters)
From: Masha Drokova [REDACTED]
Sent: 8/7/2017 9:23:29 PM
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: Fwd: Re:
Sent: 8/7/2017 9:23:29 PM
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: Fwd: Re:
Importance: High
Begin forwarded message:
From: Masha Drokova <[REDACTED]>
Date: August 7, 2017 at 12:28:08 AM PDT
To: "Nowak, Martin A." <[REDACTED]>
Subject: Re:
Date: August 7, 2017 at 12:28:08 AM PDT
To: "Nowak, Martin A." <[REDACTED]>
Subject: Re:
Hi Martin,
Just wanted to check if you've seen the previous email.
If it's more convenient for you to discuss it by Skype, let me know. If you want to skip any of them it's not a problem.
On Aug 2, 2017, at 3:02 PM, Masha Drokova <[REDACTED]> wrote:
Hi Martin,
Thanks for the great call last week. Enjoyed it a lot. Could I ask you some follow up questions?
Question to be answered by Martin.
• What specifically did Epstein fund that allowed you to make an advancement in applying math to complicated systems, right?
• Is there a paper you're about to publish? Something in peer review? That might come out in Nature or Science?
• The area you work on seems to be an attractive area of science, is it hard to secure funding?
• Who are the greatest critics of your ideas on evolution? (is it EO Wilson?) have things evolved since 2010?
• What is it you think the public just does not understand about your work?
• What is it that the media gets wrong about your work and science in general (i know of only one journalist with a degree in applied math, and most have never even taken calculus)
• How has funding for your field and for you changed under Trump?
• Is there a paper you're about to publish? Something in peer review? That might come out in Nature or Science?
• The area you work on seems to be an attractive area of science, is it hard to secure funding?
• Who are the greatest critics of your ideas on evolution? (is it EO Wilson?) have things evolved since 2010?
• What is it you think the public just does not understand about your work?
• What is it that the media gets wrong about your work and science in general (i know of only one journalist with a degree in applied math, and most have never even taken calculus)
• How has funding for your field and for you changed under Trump?
Question
• Would you be ok with the angle about how much scientist should care about where their funding comes from? It’s a hot topic given this story
On Jul 28, 2017, at 7:07 AM, Masha Drokova <[REDACTED]> wrote:
great, will do
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026751
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document