This document appears to be page 259 of a book or manuscript discussing the intersection of music, mathematics, and software. The text explores the concept of 'non-computable' music, referencing classical composers like Bach and Tallis alongside mathematical proofs by Andrew Wiles and Alan Turing. It features a graphic labeled 'Creative Inoculation.' The page bears a Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015949', indicating it was part of a document production for a House Oversight Committee investigation, likely related to the Epstein inquiry given the prompt context, though the text itself is philosophical/academic.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Bach | Composer |
Mentioned in the context of musical composition rules and 'Art of Fugue'.
|
| William Byrd | Composer |
Mentioned as a Tudor composer using substitution rules.
|
| Thomas Tallis | Composer |
Mentioned as a Tudor composer using substitution rules.
|
| Grieg | Composer |
Mentioned for using sequences of chords with substitution rules.
|
| Andrew Wiles | Mathematician |
Mentioned regarding his proof of Fermat's Last Theorem.
|
| Alan Turing | Mathematician |
Mentioned regarding his proof of the Halting Problem.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| House Oversight Committee |
Inferred from the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015949' at the bottom of the page.
|
"It is statistically likely that most pieces are non-computable because there are an uncountably infinite number of them, whereas computable pieces are merely countably infinite."Source
"Although I couldn’t prove a piece of music was non-computational, I could make one! – a piece that could not have been created using computation alone."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (2,451 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document