DOJ-OGR-00016742.jpg
590 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
590 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, capturing a procedural debate between the court and two attorneys, Mr. Everdell and Ms. Menninger. The discussion centers on the defense's desire to introduce a new witness, the relevance of ownership documents, a stipulation regarding testimony from a Ms. Maxwell, and the recent discovery of a 2019 deposition of Ms. Menninger's client. The transcript highlights the strategic arguments over evidence and witness presentation during a trial.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Judge | Judge |
Mentioned by an unidentified speaker as having a 'good point'.
|
| MR. EVERDELL | Attorney |
A speaker in the transcript, likely an attorney, arguing that they are not delaying the trial and discussing a stipul...
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
A speaker in the transcript, representing the judge, questioning the introduction of a new witness and a deposition t...
|
| Ms. Maxwell |
Mentioned in the context of her testimony being admitted via a stipulation with the government.
|
|
| MS. MENNINGER | Attorney |
A speaker in the transcript, likely an attorney, explaining that a 2019 deposition of her client was new information ...
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2019
A property deposition related to a 'slip and fall' case where Ms. Menninger's client was deposed as a third-party witness.
Ms. Menninger's client
2022-08-10
A discussion during a trial regarding procedural matters, including the introduction of a new witness and the admissibility of evidence.
Courtroom
Relationships (3)
The Court addresses Ms. Menninger about 'your client', and she proceeds to discuss a deposition her client gave.
Mr. Everdell addresses the Court as 'Your Honor' during a legal proceeding.
Ms. Menninger addresses the Court as 'your Honor' while explaining her position on a piece of evidence.
Key Quotes (3)
"Your Honor, we're not delaying trial. We only had one day of defense case."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Responding to the implication that proposing a new witness would delay the trial.)
DOJ-OGR-00016742.jpg
Quote #1
"You're announcing a new witness simply because I've questioned the relevance of the ownership documents by asking if they showed ownership or residency..."Source
— THE COURT
(Questioning the motivation behind the defense's attempt to introduce a new witness.)
DOJ-OGR-00016742.jpg
Quote #2
"It was a property deposition that was taken in 2019, a slip and fall, and she was deposed as a third-party witness. They didn't give it to us. We still don't have the entire deposition."Source
— MS. MENNINGER
(Explaining to the court that a deposition transcript is new information to the defense.)
DOJ-OGR-00016742.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,717 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 13 of 197
LCFCmax1
LCFCmax1
1 That's just saying, oh, Judge has a good point, maybe we could
2 strengthen this, I'm going to propose a new witness and delay
3 trial. No.
4 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, we're not delaying trial.
5 We only had one day of defense case. We're allowed to put
6 on --
7 THE COURT: You're announcing a new witness simply
8 because I've questioned the relevance of the ownership
9 documents by asking if they showed ownership or residency,
10 because I thought, well, if it's just ownership, maybe it's not
11 relevant, but I'm letting them in. If I weren't letting them
12 in, I suppose you'd have a point.
13 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, the way the stipulation I
14 understand is going to be worded with the government allowing
15 admitting the testimony from Ms. Maxwell's testimony, they will
16 be arguing to the jury that that shows that she didn't reside
17 there, that the ownership records don't show residency, and you
18 can infer from that that maybe she was there at the time
19 period.
20 THE COURT: Is that deposition transcript new
21 information to you? You weren't aware that your client --
22 MS. MENNINGER: It was a property deposition that was
23 taken in 2019, a slip and fall, and she was deposed as a
24 third-party witness. They didn't give it to us. We still
25 don't have the entire deposition. So yes, your Honor, it is
2 strengthen this, I'm going to propose a new witness and delay
3 trial. No.
4 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, we're not delaying trial.
5 We only had one day of defense case. We're allowed to put
6 on --
7 THE COURT: You're announcing a new witness simply
8 because I've questioned the relevance of the ownership
9 documents by asking if they showed ownership or residency,
10 because I thought, well, if it's just ownership, maybe it's not
11 relevant, but I'm letting them in. If I weren't letting them
12 in, I suppose you'd have a point.
13 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, the way the stipulation I
14 understand is going to be worded with the government allowing
15 admitting the testimony from Ms. Maxwell's testimony, they will
16 be arguing to the jury that that shows that she didn't reside
17 there, that the ownership records don't show residency, and you
18 can infer from that that maybe she was there at the time
19 period.
20 THE COURT: Is that deposition transcript new
21 information to you? You weren't aware that your client --
22 MS. MENNINGER: It was a property deposition that was
23 taken in 2019, a slip and fall, and she was deposed as a
24 third-party witness. They didn't give it to us. We still
25 don't have the entire deposition. So yes, your Honor, it is
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016742
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document