This document is a transcript from a court proceeding on July 16, 2019, where a lawyer is speaking on behalf of their client, Mr. Epstein. The lawyer describes a past comprehensive legal agreement that included a plea, victim compensation, and a non-prosecution agreement from the federal government. The lawyer argues that since 2008, Mr. Epstein has led a law-abiding life under constant monitoring and that the current court case arises from litigation under the Crime Victims Rights Act.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Epstein | Client |
The subject of the legal proceedings being discussed. The speaker, his lawyer, describes a past agreement and his lif...
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| main justice | Government agency |
Mentioned as having approved a past agreement at a 'very, very high level'. This is a colloquial term for the leaders...
|
| federal government | Government agency |
Mentioned as providing a 'declination' (NPA) as part of a past agreement.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting firm that transcribed the proceedings.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The location where a plea was involved in a past agreement.
|
"Mr. Epstein continued a life of success, generosity, creativity and, more important, a law-abiding life from 2008 forward."Source
"There was one particular litigation that leads to this occasion, and that is, under the Crime Victims Rights Act, that act simply says that victims have a right to be consulted by"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,566 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document