DOJ-OGR-00009427.jpg
402 KB
Extraction Summary
8
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
402 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript dated February 24, 2012, detailing the redirect examination of a witness, Mr. Schoeman. An attorney, Mr. Shechtman, questions Mr. Schoeman about a conversation on or after May 13th, in which Ms. Trzaskoma told him she had rejected the conclusion that Juror No. 1 was a suspended attorney. The witness confirms the conversation but states he had no specific understanding of her reasoning, attributing the information sharing to their established pattern during the lengthy trial.
People (8)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Shechtman | Attorney |
Conducting the redirect examination of Mr. Schoeman.
|
| Mr. Schoeman | Witness |
Being questioned about a conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma.
|
| Ms. Trzaskoma |
Mentioned as having told Mr. Schoeman that she rejected the conclusion about Juror No. 1.
|
|
| Juror No. 1 | Juror |
The subject of a conclusion that they were a suspended attorney.
|
| MR. OKULA | Attorney |
States he has nothing further to ask the witness.
|
| Mr. Parse |
Mentioned by Mr. Shechtman as calling the next witness, Barry Berke.
|
|
| Barry Berke | Witness |
Called as the next witness by Mr. Parse.
|
| BARRY H. BERKE | Witness |
Full name listed for the next witness to be called.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript page, likely the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2012-02-24
Redirect examination of witness Mr. Schoeman by attorney Mr. Shechtman.
Courtroom
On or after May 13th (year not specified)
Ms. Trzaskoma informed Mr. Schoeman that she had rejected the conclusion that Juror No. 1 was a suspended attorney.
Unknown
Relationships (2)
They spent "many months of trial together" and had a "pattern of sharing information during the course of the trial."
Mr. Parse calls Barry Berke as a witness. Mr. Shechtman states they are of the "same law firm."
Key Quotes (3)
"Mr. Schoeman, just to be clear, on May 13th or sometime thereafter Ms. Trzaskoma told you that she had rejected the conclusion that Juror No. 1 was a suspended attorney, is that correct?"Source
— MR. SHECHTMAN
(Question during redirect examination to confirm the details of a conversation.)
DOJ-OGR-00009427.jpg
Quote #1
"I didn't have an understanding. We, having spent many months of trial together, often shared information. It was consistent with our pattern of sharing information during the course of the trial. But I have described I think the entirety of the conversation."Source
— THE WITNESS (Mr. Schoeman)
(Response to the Court's question about why Ms. Trzaskoma shared information about her deliberative process.)
DOJ-OGR-00009427.jpg
Quote #2
"Mr. Parse calls Barry Berke of the same law firm."Source
— MR. SHECHTMAN
(Informing the court of the next witness to be called.)
DOJ-OGR-00009427.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,236 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00380-PAEumDocument 616-3 Filed 02/24/12 Page 83 of 117
A-5823
A-5823
C2grdau4
Schoeman - cross
366
Schoeman - cross
366
1 THE COURT: Mr. Shechtman.
2 REDIRECT EXAMINATION
3 BY MR. SHECHTMAN:
4 Q. Mr. Schoeman, just to be clear, on May 13th or sometime
5 thereafter Ms. Trzaskoma told you that she had rejected the
6 conclusion that Juror No. 1 was a suspended attorney, is that
7 correct?
8 A. Yes.
9 MR. SHECHTMAN: Very good.
10 MR. OKULA: Nothing else, your Honor.
11 THE COURT: Mr. Schoeman, did you get any
12 understanding from Ms. Trzaskoma as to why it was that she was
13 sharing this information or her deliberative process with you?
14 THE WITNESS: I didn't have an understanding. We,
15 having spent many months of trial together, often shared
16 information. It was consistent with our pattern of sharing
17 information during the course of the trial. But I have
18 described I think the entirety of the conversation.
19 THE COURT: Anything further?
20 MR. OKULA: Nothing. Thank you, your Honor.
21 THE COURT: You're excused. You may step down.
22 (Witness excused)
23 MR. SHECHTMAN: Mr. Parse calls Barry Berke of the
24 same law firm.
25 BARRY H. BERKE.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
2 REDIRECT EXAMINATION
3 BY MR. SHECHTMAN:
4 Q. Mr. Schoeman, just to be clear, on May 13th or sometime
5 thereafter Ms. Trzaskoma told you that she had rejected the
6 conclusion that Juror No. 1 was a suspended attorney, is that
7 correct?
8 A. Yes.
9 MR. SHECHTMAN: Very good.
10 MR. OKULA: Nothing else, your Honor.
11 THE COURT: Mr. Schoeman, did you get any
12 understanding from Ms. Trzaskoma as to why it was that she was
13 sharing this information or her deliberative process with you?
14 THE WITNESS: I didn't have an understanding. We,
15 having spent many months of trial together, often shared
16 information. It was consistent with our pattern of sharing
17 information during the course of the trial. But I have
18 described I think the entirety of the conversation.
19 THE COURT: Anything further?
20 MR. OKULA: Nothing. Thank you, your Honor.
21 THE COURT: You're excused. You may step down.
22 (Witness excused)
23 MR. SHECHTMAN: Mr. Parse calls Barry Berke of the
24 same law firm.
25 BARRY H. BERKE.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00009427
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document