A New York Times article contained a single sentence alleging misconduct by an unidentified juror, which a court held was insufficient to justify a hearing.
This legal document argues that a news article alleging juror misconduct is insufficient to warrant an evidentiary hearing. It cites numerous legal precedents from various courts, including the Second Circuit, which have consistently held that unsworn, hearsay, anonymous, or speculative reports do not meet the high evidentiary standard required to investigate such claims.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication