📧 Communication

emails

Communication Details

From
To
Unknown
Subject
Authentication of evidence
Message Content

The document cites cases, including United States v. Bertram, where a witness was allowed to authenticate emails based on familiarity with the defendant's communication style, even if they were not a recipient of the specific email.

📄 Source Document

DOJ-OGR-00008306.jpg
DOJ Collection
View Document
Document Summary

This legal document is a memorandum of law, likely from the prosecution, arguing for the admission of an exhibit (GX 52) into evidence. It counters a defense objection that the witness, Mr. Alessi, cannot authenticate the exhibit because he has no personal knowledge of its creation. The memorandum cites several legal precedents to support the argument that a document can be authenticated under Rule 901(b)(4) based on its distinctive characteristics or a witness's general familiarity, even without direct observation of its creation.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication