An unnamed speaker argues that Jane's return trip from New Mexico was not for the purpose of illicit sexual activity because Mr. Epstein was not present. The speaker contrasts this with Jane's testimony that her trip to New Mexico was for that purpose.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument about the purpose of travel undertaken by a person named Jane. An unnamed speaker argues that Jane's return trip from New Mexico was not for illicit sexual activity because Mr. Epstein was not present, while another speaker, Ms. Moe, counters that the evidence is ambiguous as to which flight is being discussed. The conversation centers on interpreting Jane's intent and whether her travel meets the elements of a crime.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication