📧 Communication

letter

Communication Details

From
To
The Government the government
Subject
Jury discussions and deliberations regarding David Parse
Message Content

Discussed deliberations regarding David Parse and the struggle regarding definitions of wilfully and knowingly.

📄 Source Document

DOJ-OGR-00009501.jpg
DOJ Collection
View Document
Document Summary

This document is page 82 of a court transcript filed on February 24, 2022, as an exhibit (A-5925) in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330). The text captures a legal argument by Ms. Davis referencing the 'Parse' case (likely United States v. Parse) and a letter from juror Catherine Conrad. The argument focuses on the legal distinction between 'wilfully' and 'knowingly' in the context of tax evasion and conspiracy counts, and how the jury's split verdict demonstrates a lack of prejudice and a deliberate decision-making process. This appears to be a citation of precedent used during post-trial motions in the Maxwell trial.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication